After reading this chapter it answered a question I had in
my mind this whole time. Why are there
charts on the beginning of every chapter.
After reading the chapter and looking back at the charts they are great
tools. They layout the whole chapter and
what will be covered. To build off this,
this chapter was about the preparation stage in PAR. It started out with some interesting
information that I felt was very important.
Even the smartest of people have a hard time reading things they are not
interested in. This fact made me feel a
lot better. I know that as a student it
wasn’t ever that reading was too hard, I just didn’t find it interesting. The book then describe how the process of
learning is like a basketball game. This
was a great analogy, which is another tool they brought up, that could be used
to help students understand the learning process. After all this the reading began talking
about prior knowledge. We know that
people learn better when they can apply it to something they already know, it
can just be hard to do this in the classroom.
Teacher’s need to get creative to activate that prior knowledge to
reading. They talked about some examples
to use to help active prior knowledge.
The examples they gave were; prelearning concept check, story
impressions, K-W-L activity, WIKA, rewriting text, written previews, graphic
organizers, anticipation guides, factstorming, prep strategy, and
analogies. I found a lot of these very
good ways to help prepare for reading. I
really liked the analogies idea because it is a great way to try and connect
the story to what students already know about.
I have to also say, I love how the book has an example of all the
different ideas to get a sense of what it could look like. I was a little confused before on what
activities are done in the preparation stage but know I almost feel like an
expert on ideas to use.
I'm glad you brought up the fact that the authors applied their preparation strategies in the very preparation of the chapter. That's very perceptive; I hadn't noticed that. Now I know why I was so receptive to what they authors had to say. I also felt more secure in my ability to activate prior knowledge once I read and understood the strategies they offered. So in your opinion, would you say that the analogies strategy was the best in the chapter?
ReplyDeleteI think for myself it was because it helped me understand better by relating it to something I already knew about.
Delete